Re: New version numbering practices

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: New version numbering practices
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwaOvDTyVs3Z1QxJTsaPjDC-BVVitnxAC9qPxNhRNSRwNQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: New version numbering practices  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: New version numbering practices  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: 
Over the past couple of months I have already found myself
writing "10.0" or "9.7^H^H^H10" to make it clear that I meant the next
release version, because just "10" seemed too ambiguous.

​I thought that was just (and maybe some instances were) humor regarding the general indecisiveness on the issue.​
 
  Maybe I'm
worried about nothing and the ambiguity mostly came from our not having
settled the two-or-three-part-version-number question, but I'm not sure.

​I think this dynamic will sort itself out.
​
I suspect I'll end up using 10.x somewhat frequently though I'm mostly on the lists.  I suspect the choice will be dependent on context and channel.

David J.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables