Re: [GENERAL] hard parse?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: [GENERAL] hard parse?
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwaCCRBWYbwdd9-NqsSnueeveBK=_yh8vr=LKD+1djGyJg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [GENERAL] hard parse?  (Peter Koukoulis <pkoukoulis@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] hard parse?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Peter Koukoulis <pkoukoulis@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi

I have a query where a filter would always be negative, how many steps, out these:
  • parsing and syntax check
  • semantic analysis
  • transformation process (query rewrite based on system or user-defined rules)
  • query optimization
  • execution
would be performed or not? Also, where in the documentation can I found out which of the above phases would be performed?

For example, for a query such as the following:

select x,y from test1 where 1=0;


I'm inferring behavior here but...​

​All of them.  You are still going to get a result set with zero records and the correct column structure.  i.e., "Execution".  None of the other stuff can be skipped in getting to engine to that point.  With a "always false" predicate and that simple of a query structure most of the other stuff, including execution, is probably performed is seemingly zero time but it still has to work through that step of the process - if nothing else than to move through an if-branch to decide that nothing material needs to be done.

David J.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] a JOIN to a VIEW seems slow
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] hard parse?