Re: Missing word
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Missing word |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwa2snry2C9neinwPui-hZhqb-TX5WMN1TEmd6iy_JXBZw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Список | pgsql-docs |
On Tuesday, May 13, 2025, PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/ddl-partitioning.html
Description:
In the paragraph:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning. html#DDL-PARTITIONING- DECLARATIVE-MAINTENANCE,
sentence "Another option that is often preferable is to remove the partition
from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
right." there is missing "not" word. Correct form of this sentence should
be: Another option that is often preferable is to not remove the partition
from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
right.
The existing wording is correct. The fact it immediately precedes a detach partition command example should make this abundantly clear. Though adding “not” as you’ve done doesn’t make any sense regardless - it is a self-contradiction to both be a partition and independent (on its own right).
David J.
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: