Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwZwMOkw-7112u1-gXEhRWuXiZe9otp801Z3dPVvarKdsA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:35 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

I disagree here, actually.  Temporary tables are a different beast
because they require automated cleanup which would include interacting
with the partitionining information if temp and non-temp relations are
mixed.  That's why the current restrictions are in place: you should
[ not ] ? 
be able to mix them.

My point is that if you feel that treating logged as a copy-able property is OK then doing the following should also just work:

postgres=# create temp table parentt ( id integer ) partition by range (id);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# create table child10t partition of parentt for values from (0) to (9);
ERROR:  cannot create a permanent relation as partition of temporary relation "parentt"

i.e., child10t should be created as a temporary partition under parentt.

David J.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness