On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 12:44 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 12:59:23PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 09:14:56AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > > So leave the "release" behavior implied from the rollback behavior? > > > > On the whole I'm slightly in favor of your proposed wording (mostly due to the > > better fitting of the ROLLBACK command, though at the omission of RELEASE...) > > but are you seeing anything beyond personal style as to why you feel one is > > better than the other? Is there some existing wording in the docs that I > > should be conforming to here? > > I have developed the attached patch based on the discussion here. I > tried to simplify the language and example to clarify the intent. > > I was confused why the first part of the patch added a mention of > releasing savepoints to the ROLLBACK TO manual page --- I have removed > that and improved the text in RELEASE SAVEPOINT.
Patch applied to all supported versions.
Bruce,
Thanks for committing this and the other patches. Should I go into the commitfest and mark the entries for these as committed or does protocol dictate I remind you and you do that?