Re: BUG #15168: "pg_isready -d" effectively ignores given database name

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: BUG #15168: "pg_isready -d" effectively ignores given database name
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwZb+XrzPJ48ZbO52Yd=oAxFrRhSTK_XXr3Z4kLoL5d8Yw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на BUG #15168: "pg_isready -d" effectively ignores given database name  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: BUG #15168: "pg_isready -d" effectively ignores given databasename  (jake <jakelist@zoho.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения
On Monday, April 23, 2018, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
# Not expected, database "jibberish" does not exist:
$ pg_isready -d jibberish
/run/media/jthomas/BackupOne/development/snowdrift/.postgres-work:5432 -
accepting connections

The notes section of the docs for the command cover this behavior.  It is not a bug, the utility answers whether the server will accept connections generally, not that a specific connection string and credentials are valid.

David J.

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #15168: "pg_isready -d" effectively ignores given database name
Следующее
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #15169: create index CONCURRENTLY conflict with other table's COPY