Re: PERIOD foreign key feature

In this commit:

        commit 34768ee3616
        Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
        Date:   Sun Mar 24 07:37:13 2024 +0100

            Add temporal FOREIGN KEY contraints

            Add PERIOD clause to foreign key constraint definitions.  This is
            supported for range and multirange types.  Temporal foreign keys check
            for range containment instead of equality.

            This feature matches the behavior of the SQL standard temporal foreign
            keys, but it works on PostgreSQL's native ranges instead of SQL's
            "periods", which don't exist in PostgreSQL (yet).

            Reference actions ON {UPDATE,DELETE} {CASCADE,SET NULL,SET DEFAULT}
            are not supported yet.

            Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
            Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
            Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
            Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg@mail.gmail.com

this text was added to create_table.sgml:

        In addition, the referenced table must have a primary
        key or unique constraint declared with <literal>WITHOUT
-->     OVERLAPS</literal>.  Finally, if one side of the foreign key
-->     uses <literal>PERIOD</literal>, the other side must too.  If the
        <replaceable class="parameter">refcolumn</replaceable> list is
        omitted, the <literal>WITHOUT OVERLAPS</literal> part of the
        primary key is treated as if marked with <literal>PERIOD</literal>.

In the two marked lines, it says "if one side of the foreign key uses
PERIOD, the other side must too."  However, looking at the example
queries, it seems like if the foreign side has PERIOD, the primary side
must have WITHOUT OVERLAPS, not PERIOD.

Does this doc text need correcting?