Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes
От | David G. Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKFQuwZThU_Z-Zw+3mr+ecp1BVOw777dp3nXU5-wTVk3kS10gw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 3:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks Robert for confirming, let me submit a patch to fix the same.
Well, the first thing you need is consensus on what the behavior
should be instead.
I have a very vague recollection that we concluded that SELECT
privilege was a reasonable check because if you have that you
could manually prewarm by reading the table. That would lead
to the conclusion that the minimal fix is to look at the owning
table's privileges instead of the index's own privileges.
I feel like if you can blow up the cache by loading an entire table into memory with just select privilege on the table we should be ok with allowing the same person to name an index on the same table and load it into the cache too.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: