Re: BUG #15168: "pg_isready -d" effectively ignores given database name

​I'd argue that you would spell that:

psql -c 'SELECT 1;'

or (with maybe a more useful select-list, like version, to reinforce you are where you think you are), with whatever options and environment you wish tacked onto it.

Turning something that today that conforms to the spec and results in success into a failure is generally undesirable.

I'd be more inclined to modify pg_isready to simply ignore any user/password/database arguments in the environment, and remove them from the command line spec (or document them as being ignored since they are accepted today), if that is possible.  Then the API and its charter would match AND you'd avoid the spurious FATAL in the log.

For the spec you describe a new utility command would likely be a better solution.

David J.

​