Re: Custom GUCs and typos
От | David G. Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Custom GUCs and typos |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKFQuwYcuyrfZXqz44N7Su8UotLcpdYc7S40D=iyi8R2xeBSAg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Custom GUCs and typos (Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 7:52 PM Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133@gmail.com> wrote:
1) On top of OP's patch I added support to warn if the prefix of custom GUC is invalid,for valid questions such as "How do you know that's a bogus prefix? It could perfectly well be a fully valid setting for an extension that the installation doesn't choose to preload.",we can get the info of such extensions using extension_file_exists() which tells that its installed but not preloaded thanks to Greg for proposing this,which tells this could be a potential valid extension ,so if its not it in reserved_class_prefix and also not in prefix/share/extension dir then the prefix is for sure invalid,so i warn and remove the GUC from hashtable.
People can and do create GUCs without any intention or need to write C code or place files onto the server to make use of them.
"PostgreSQL will accept a setting for any two-part parameter name."
We cannot change this. So, please include discussion of their existence in any description of changes you wish to make in this area.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: