Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwYTVwe_WGq22+O7CoztffbrhNh4bQfuSU2Kr6RQLQE5DA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions (Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, March 17, 2025, Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2."you have not any temporary relations" --> "you have no any temporary
> relations"
I am not an English speaker, but it seems that "have not" would be
more correct. Someone has to judge us :)
Both are not good.
“pg_temp was specified but it contains no relations” [1]
But why are we promoting this situation to an error? It should be a relation not found error just like any other and not its own special case. The fact we create pg_temp only as it is needed is an implementation detail that should not be visible to the user. Either by saying pg_temp not found (possibly at this point) or pretending it does and letting the relation name lookup produce the error.
David J.
[1] It isn’t part of the style guide but I don’t think we use “you” to directly refer to the query author in error messages.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: