Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwYHHd_UDR7OwhbCkw0H-7=kP9k1otrS187dd_ag-mospQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con  (rakeshkumar464 <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:48 AM, rakeshkumar464 <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com> wrote:
I would prefer using postgresql.conf.  what is the consensus in this forum
regarding command line vs postgresql.conf. 

​I suspect that most people administering a PostgreSQL database would expect that the configuration file would be changed in lieu of passing options via the command line.

Also if conflicting, which one
takes priority.


David J.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con
Следующее
От: Alexander Farber
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Comparing epoch to timestamp