Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G Johnston
Тема Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit.
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwY4nqEjcxWLzzLmGQ0HzK1RpasUGq7YFqiW7n33T_im8A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit.  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit.  (Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Stephen Frost [via PostgreSQL] <[hidden email]> wrote:
David,

* David Johnston ([hidden email]) wrote:
> ​This is 9.5 material because 1) it isn't all that critical and, 2) we DO
> NOT want a system to not come up because of a GUC paring error after a
> minor-release update.

Agreed.

> ​I don't get where we "need" to do anything else besides that...the whole
> "actual min values" comment is unclear to me.

Well, for cases that allow going to zero as an "off" option, we've
already decided, I believe, that sub-1-unit options are off the table
and so the min value is at *least* 1, but there could be cases where '1'
doesn't actually make any sense and it should be higher than that.

Consider the log file rotation bit.  If it was in seconds, would it
actually make sense to support actually doing a rotation *every second*?

No.

In that case, perhaps we'd set the minimum to '60s', even though
technically we could represent less than that, it's not sensible to do
so.  The point of having minimum (and maximum..) values is that typos
and other mistakes happen and we want the user to realize they've made a
mistake.

What needs to happen next is a review of all the GUCs which allow going
to zero and which treat zero as a special value, and consider what the
*actual* minimum value for those should be (excluding zero).  I was
hoping you might be interested in doing that... :D


Like I said I just want to fix the bug and call it a day :)

For me just enforcing 1 as the minimum for everything would be fine.

I'd rather mandate non-integer data entry than impose an actual minimum that is greater than 1.  Specifically a too-short/too-small value might be used during exploration and testing by a new user even if the same value would never be useful in production.  That, in fact, is the one reason that allowing "5s" for log rotation age would make sense - to allow people to more easily checking their log rotation policies.  But making it work without disrupting people using "=60' (1hr) is impossible without simply outlawing unitless values.

David J.




View this message in context: Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit.
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit.