Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix
| От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKAnmmKQfoud2PjWtY6j4BhgpKhimbCMZry_NXq7UDtT2TFPDg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix
Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 6:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
1. Ignore the inconsistency, commit 0004 as-is.
2. Change the output to be an empty string in background processes.
This is consistent, but it goes against our upthread feeling that "[none]" would avoid confusion.
I lean for #1. Yes, there is some inconsistency, but it feels like the right thing to do, and this is a feature I suspect not many people will use anyway.
--
Cheers,
Greg
--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: