Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Sabino Mullane
Тема Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i
Дата
Msg-id CAKAnmmJgHvPooiXZ5vzvONMWjcazg+Z4VEPrHW_NVFmUvYAX2g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i  ("Abraham, Danny" <danny_abraham@bmc.com>)
Список pgsql-general
CVE-2025-1094 has a narrow blast radius. If you are not directly affected, I would focus your efforts on getting to 17. But the lack of an existing process to smoothly upgrade minor revisions is worrying and something that needs to get addressed as well.

Cheers,
Greg

--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: