Re: Implicit make rules break test examples

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Donald Dong
Тема Re: Implicit make rules break test examples
Дата
Msg-id CAKABAqsWzee4Q6qnkgO8UnWrDroRJnZL3f2bxxgQ+B=rpLnoZg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Implicit make rules break test examples  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Implicit make rules break test examples  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Thank you for the explanation! That makes sense. It is strange that it does not work for me.
 
What platform are you on exactly, and what toolchain (gcc and ld
versions) are you using?

I'm using Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS.

gcc version:
gcc (Ubuntu 7.3.0-27ubuntu1~18.04) 7.3.0

ld version:
GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.30

Regards,
Donald Dong


On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 9:54 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Donald Dong <xdong@csumb.edu> writes:
> In src/test/example, the implicit make rules produce errors:

Hm.  "make" in src/test/examples works fine for me.

The only way I can account for the results you're showing is if your
linker is preferring libpq.a to libpq.so, so that reading the library
before the *.o files causes none of it to get pulled in.  But that
isn't the default behavior on any modern platform AFAIK, and certainly
isn't considered good practice these days.  Moreover, if that's what's
happening, I don't see how you would have managed to build PG at all,
because there are a lot of other places where our Makefiles write
$(LDFLAGS) before the *.o files they're trying to link.  Maybe we
shouldn't have done it like that, but it's been working for everybody
else.

What platform are you on exactly, and what toolchain (gcc and ld
versions) are you using?

                        regards, tom lane


--
Donald Dong

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option