Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom DalPozzo
Тема Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed
Дата
Msg-id CAK77FCQg_mZjvsJr6s=-bdQtq2pXA7YoVYHsSPDkGHaAkAcW6w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
Hi, I had already read that doc but I can't  answer clearly to my
questions 2,4 and 5.

The answer would seem to depend on what you consider 'a consistency state position'. Is it possible to be more explicit about what you mean?

Hi, I meant a position such that, if you replay up to it, then the DB is in a consistent state (transactions done entirely or not a t all...).
But, as Alvaro wrote, any position is ok
Thank you very much
Pupillo


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom DalPozzo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed
Следующее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Improve PostGIS performance with 62 million rows?