Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
| От | Andrew Kim |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAK64mne=Q_4VSpJ8f4RQB-yAThd4+i-BRYMvfdGOhvwJQdYoKQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 8:48 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 10:32 AM Andrew Kim <tenistarkim@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I've double-checked everything after applying the v9 checksum patches > > and updating pg_filedump accordingly. > > Following your suggestion, I removed the checksum_impl.h include and > > the Assert redefinition, keeping only the port/checksum.h include. > > build compiles cleanly with the new architecture, and pg_filedump > > functions correctly with the AVX2 optimizations. > > If you agree with this approach, I'd like to prepare a patch for > > upstream submission. > > Thanks, but there is no action required now. I mentioned some > observations, and I'm going to experiment a bit further. > > Also, it's way too early to be suggesting changes to other projects, > since we haven't committed anything yet. Even things committed can > occasionally be reverted before beta 1 anyway. It makes sense, I fully understand. I will standby and wait for your next update. -Andrew Kim > -- > John Naylor > Amazon Web Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: