Re: psql: tab completions for 'WITH'
| От | Josh Kupershmidt |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql: tab completions for 'WITH' |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAK3UJRH8wr920zH3pL6w-TSN7K8aah1oDF7=cmvyx06sUBdn9A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psql: tab completions for 'WITH' (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql: tab completions for 'WITH'
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On tis, 2012-04-03 at 22:34 -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: >> I noticed psql's tab-completion for 'WITH' is a bit overeager. If you >> try to tab-complete commands like: >> ALTER ROLE jsmith WITH [TAB] >> COPY tbl FROM 'filename' WITH [TAB] >> >> you'll get 'RECURSIVE' unhelpfully filled in. I think 'RECURSIVE' >> should only be suggested if 'WITH' is the first and only word of the >> line. > > Committed that. Thanks! >> On a related note, I found it annoying that after fixing the above >> problem, trying: >> ALTER ROLE jsmith WITH [TAB] >> CREATE ROLE jsmith WITH [TAB] >> >> didn't suggest any tab-completions -- it only works if you leave off >> the 'WITH' noise word, which I happen to use. > > Hmm, but now you've set it up so that you can complete ALTER ROLE foo > WITH WITH. Were you aware of that? D'oh, I overlooked that. Attached is v2: the diff is a tad lengthier now, but that should fix it. Josh
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: