Serializable wrong?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua Drake
Тема Serializable wrong?
Дата
Msg-id CAJvJg-QdcQ7raGRrgmOEgApWHC=1cqd0G2uOvh=qSHP0k6gDsg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Serializable wrong?  (Pantelis Theodosiou <ypercube@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
-Hackers,

I came across this today [1], "
3 Results

In most respects, PostgreSQL behaved as expected: both read uncommitted and read committed prevent write skew and aborted reads. We observed no internal consistency violations. However, we have two surprising results to report. The first is that PostgreSQL’s “repeatable read” is weaker than repeatable read, at least as defined by Berenson, Adya, Bailis, et al. This is not necessarily wrong: the ANSI SQL standard is ambiguous. The second result, which is definitely wrong, is that PostgreSQL’s “serializable” isolation level isn’t serializable: it allows G2-item during normal operation. "

Thanks!

JD

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel Seq Scan vs kernel read ahead
Следующее
От: Andrew Gierth
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Infinities in type numeric