At Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:14:23 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote in <CAB7nPqSf8dBndoKT5DeR6FpzDUSuXN_g7uWNPQuN_A_sEwB-uw@mail.gmail.com> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > Sorry for no response, but, the answer is yes. We could be able > > to avoid the problem by managing execution state for every > > node. But it needs an additional flag in *State structs and > > manipulating on the way shuttling up and down around the > > execution tree. > > Moved to next CF.
Thank you.
Closed in 2016-11 commitfest with "returned with feedback" status.
This is as per my understanding of the recent mails on the thread.
Please feel free to update the status if the current status doesn't