Re: Index scan optimization

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Haribabu Kommi
Тема Re: Index scan optimization
Дата
Msg-id CAJrrPGcsEhNQYV833=mH=un2CaTtcapuDq2uAm14dY2BJbFyXg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Index scan optimization  (Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com>)
Ответы Re: Index scan optimization
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Rajeev rastogi
<rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com> wrote:
> On 26 October 2014 10:42, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
>> I have a question regarding setting of key flags matched. Only the
>> first key was set as matched even if we have multiple index conditions.
>> Is there any reason behind that?
>
> Actually the keysCount can be more than one only if the key strategy is BTEqualStrategyNumber (i.e. = condition)
> But our optimization is only for the '>' or '>=' condition only. So adding code to set flag for all keys is of no
use.
>
> Let me know if I am missing anything here?

Thanks. I understood the point.

>> If any volatile function is present in the index condition, the index
>> scan itself is not choosen, Is there any need of handling the same
>> similar to NULLS?
>
> Do you mean to say that whether we should add any special handling for volatile function?
> If yes then as you said since index scan itself is not selected for such functions, then
> I feel We don’t need to add anything for that.

I also have the same opinion. I marked the patch as ready for committer.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Szymon Guz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: printing table in asciidoc with psql
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion