Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance
От | shveta malik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJpy0uCTTpJw1=PX7jy1Rnj6kUjkndzf6EmwYnFRm1O2+VZhzg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 10:14 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 9:34 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 3:47 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I am not able to apply the patch to the latest head or even to a week > > > > back version. Can you please check and rebase? > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > Shveta > > > > > > Rebased. > > > > > > > Thanks. Please find a few comments: > > > > > > 1) > > /* Any slot with NULL in these fields should not have made it this far */ > > > > It is good to get rid of the case where we had checks for NULL > > confirmed_lsn and catalog_xmin (i.e. when slot was in RS_EPHEMERAL > > state), as that has already been checked by synchronize_slots() and > > such a slot will not even reach wait_for_primary_slot_catchup(). But a > > slot can still be invalidated on primary anytime, and thus during this > > wait, we should check for primary's invalidation as we were doing in > > v1. > > > > 2) > > + * If in SQL API synchronization, and we've been promoted, then no point > > > > extra space before promoted. > > > > 3) > > > > + if (!AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess() && PromoteIsTriggered()) > > > > We don't need 'AmLogicalSlotSyncWorkerProcess' as that is already > > checked at the beginning of this function. > > > > 4) > > + ereport(WARNING, > > + errmsg("aborting sync for slot \"%s\"", > > + remote_slot->name), > > + errdetail("Promotion occurred before this slot was fully" > > + " synchronized.")); > > + pfree(cmd.data); > > + > > + return false; > > > > a) Please add an error-code. > > > > b) Shall we change msg to > > > > errmsg("aborting sync for slot \"%s\"", > > remote_slot->name), > > errhint("%s cannot be executed once promotion is > > triggered.", > > > > "pg_sync_replication_slots()"))); > > > > > > > > 5) > > Instead of using PromoteIsTriggered, shall we rely on > > 'SlotSyncCtx->stopSignaled' as we do when we start this API. > > > > 6) > > In logicaldecoding.sgml, we can get rid of "Additionally, enabling > > sync_replication_slots on the standby is required" to make it same as > > what we had prior to the patch I pointed earlier. > > > > Or better we can refine it to below. Thoughts? > > > > The logical replication slots on the primary can be enabled for > > synchronization to the hot standby by using the failover parameter of > > pg_create_logical_replication_slot, or by using the failover option of > > CREATE SUBSCRIPTION during slot creation. After that, synchronization > > can be performed either manually by calling pg_sync_replication_slots > > on the standby, or automatically by enabling sync_replication_slots on > > the standby. When sync_replication_slots is enabled, the failover > > slots are periodically synchronized by the slot sync worker. For the > > synchronization to work, ..... > > I am wondering if we should provide an optional parameter to > pg_sync_replication_slots(), to control whether to wait for the slot > to be synced or just return with ERROR as it is doing now, default can > be wait. > Do you mean specifically in case of promotion or in general, as in do not wait for primary to catch-up (anytime) and exit and drop the temporary slot while exiting? thanks Shveta
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: