>
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 at 14:59, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
> <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Note that more than half of the modifications are done by Osumi-san.
>
Please find a few minor comments.
1.
+ diffms = TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds(GetCurrentTimestamp(),
+
TimestampTzPlusMilliseconds(ts, MySubscription->minapplydelay));
on unix, above code looks unaligned (copied from unix)
2. same with:
+ interval = DatumGetIntervalP(DirectFunctionCall3(interval_in,
+
CStringGetDatum(val),
+
ObjectIdGetDatum(InvalidOid),
+
Int32GetDatum(-1)));
perhaps due to tabs?
2. comment not clear:
+ * During the time delayed replication, avoid reporting the suspended
+ * latest LSN are already flushed and written, to the publisher.
3.
+ * Call send_feedback() to prevent the publisher from exiting by
+ * timeout during the delay, when wal_receiver_status_interval is
+ * available. The WALs for this delayed transaction is neither
+ * written nor flushed yet, Thus, we don't make the latest LSN
+ * overwrite those positions of the update message for this delay.
yet, Thus, we --> yet, thus, we/ yet. Thus, we
4.
+ /* Adds portion time (in ms) to the previous result. */
+ ms = interval->time / INT64CONST(1000);
Is interval->time always in micro-seconds here?
Thanks
Shveta