Re: Logical Replication of sequences
От | shveta malik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJpy0uCBc0gmttQC6QpeYqu0-2pyv+s=nxUUmjAJWaXtmpZ1kA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Logical Replication of sequences (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:26 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 4:17 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks for reporting this, these issues are fixed in the attached > > v20240730_2 version patch. > > I was reviewing the design of patch003, and I have a query. Do we need to even start an apply worker and create replication slot when subscription created is for 'sequences only'? IIUC, currently logical replication apply worker is the one launching sequence-sync worker whenever needed. I think it should be the launcher doing this job and thus apply worker may even not be needed for current functionality of sequence sync? Going forward when we implement incremental sync of sequences, then we may have apply worker started but now it is not needed. thanks Shveta
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: