Re: Using failover slots for PG-non_PG logical replication
От | shveta malik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using failover slots for PG-non_PG logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJpy0uC1TUNJw1HzjjScM3=9gszy6=5UsPsSHBiUDL8Mhv-LuQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 10:50 AM Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > The failover slots documentation [1] is good for PG - PG logical > replication, but the first two queries require pg_subscription which > may not be present in non-PG downstream. Somebody looking to setup > failover slots for non-PG subscriber may not find the page useful. Okay. It appears to me that the entire document at [1] is specifically intended for a built-in replication setup, and the corresponding page was written with that context in mind. > However, the third query, when modified to mention the replication > slots relevant to the downstream is useful to them. How to find the > replication slots to be synchronized is a problem specific to the type > of downstream. Such a setup should add those slots to > sync_replication_slots. I think the chapter should mention that the > 3rd query should also include the slots mentioned in > sync_replication_slots for PG-non_PG logical replication setup. > sync_replication_slots is a boolean which enables a physical standby to synchronize logical failover slots. Did you mean something else? We could include a general note in the documentation something like: 'For non-native replication, it is the responsibility of the plugin author to define the required slots'. Then, we can directly use the third query. Thoughts? [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/logical-replication.html thanks Shveta
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: