Anyway...
Thanks to all of you for answering my puzzles, even though none of you
gave feasible answer ...
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 00:42, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Robert Young wrote:
>> The answer is simple.
>> You said, just the stats collector have some trouble.
>> Then I say, I just want to fix the stats collector.
>> You said, other things are OK.
>> Then I say, I never want to fix other things.
>>
>> I just plead with you to fix the very thing that you admit not
>> functional properly.
>> The whole database is almost functional, we won't fix the whole.
>> Component of it get in trouble, we fix the component.
>> The whole is almost functional can NOT be a reason that we should not
>> fix the nonfunctional component.
>
> You are free to distribute your own version of Postgres that does
> whatever you think is best. =C2=A0Our community has given ample thought to
> your ideas and has rejected them.
>
> --
> =C2=A0Bruce Momjian =C2=A0<bruce@momjian.us> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0h=
ttp://momjian.us
> =C2=A0EnterpriseDB =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://enterprisedb.com
>
> =C2=A0+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
>