Re: fillfactor and cluster table vs ZFS copy-on-write

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Qingqing Zhou
Тема Re: fillfactor and cluster table vs ZFS copy-on-write
Дата
Msg-id CAJjS0u3zikmWWd7g=Og_RHJC414rWYjr5kiD__8PsRWps-L7zw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на fillfactor and cluster table vs ZFS copy-on-write  (Geoff Speicher <gspeicher@umtechx.com>)
Ответы Re: fillfactor and cluster table vs ZFS copy-on-write  (Geoff Speicher <gspeicher@umtechx.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Geoff Speicher <gspeicher@umtechx.com> wrote:
> Therefore one might posit that PostgreSQL should be configured to use 100%
> fillfactor and avoid clustering on ZFS. Can anyone comment on this?
>

Even with COW, I can see fillfactor < 100% still have its virtues. For
example, HOT update can avoid adding an extra index item on the index
page if it finds the new item can be inserted in the same heap page.

When you do CLUSTER command, engine will overwrite table into new
files any way, so COW does not affect here.

Regards,
Qingqing


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PL\pgSQL 'ERROR: invalid input syntax for type oid:' [PostgreSQL 9.3.6 and 9.4]
Следующее
От: Octavi Fors
Дата:
Сообщение: database migration question between different ubuntus and different postgresql server versions