Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Nancarrow
Тема Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Дата
Msg-id CAJcOf-eoUtVsRxAbKP=8wr=VPqGp942og7NBR2L1CL6NqBdpnA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety  (Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 1:38 PM Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com> wrote:
>
> How about walking the partition hierarchy bottom up, recording the parents but not taking the locks.
> Once top-most parent is found, take the locks in reverse order (top down) ?
>

Is it safe to walk up the partition hierarchy (to record the parents
for the eventual locking in reverse order) without taking locks?


Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Zhihong Yu
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Следующее
От: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety