On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:15 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah in such a case last_error_time can be shown as a time before
> first_error_time but I don't think that will be a big problem, the
> next message will fix it. I don't see what we can do about it and the
> same is true for other cases like pg_stat_archiver where the success
> and failure times can be out of order. If we want we can remove one of
> those times but I don't think this happens frequently enough to be
> considered a problem. Anyway, these stats are not considered to be
> updated with the most latest info.
>
Couldn't the code block in pgstat_recv_subworker_error() that
increments error_count just compare the new msg timestamp against the
existing first_error_time and last_error_time and, based on the
result, update those if required?
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia