On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Joe Abbate <jma@freedomcircle.com> wrote:
>> On 30/08/12 17:36, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> FWIW, that suggests that this version of jade is too old. I'm not sure
>>> that jade per se (as opposed to the successor project openjade) can be
>>> used to build our docs at all --- you should check whether this is
>>> openjade, or really the original project.
>>
>> It was the old jade. After I installed openjade, as suggested by Alvaro
>> and Jeff Janes, and re-ran ./configure the invocation line changed to
>> use openjade.
>>
>
> so, now the question is: should we accept jade at all in configure? or
> should we fail after not finding jade and report why?
>
the last one should read "openjade" ;)
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación