Re: segmentation fault using currtid and partitioned tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jaime Casanova
Тема Re: segmentation fault using currtid and partitioned tables
Дата
Msg-id CAJGNTePbfHqWaCU50Jrg7hqFpDpZZ17qiy_bzgcBH26s0-Ac3w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: segmentation fault using currtid and partitioned tables  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: segmentation fault using currtid and partitioned tables  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 22:01, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 06:29:10PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Perhaps you are right though, and that we don't need to spend this
> > much energy into improving the error messages so I am fine to discard
> > this part.  At the end, in order to remove the crashes, you just need
> > to keep around the two RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE() checks.  But I would
> > rather keep these two to use ereport(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> > instead of elog(), and keep the test coverage of the previous patch
> > (including the tests for the aggregates I noticed were missing).
> > Would you be fine with that?
>
> And this means the attached.  Thoughts are welcome.

so, currently the patch just installs protections on both currtid_*
functions and adds some tests... therefore we can consider it as a bug
fix and let it go in 13? actually also backpatch in 12...

patch works, server doesn't crash anymore

only point to mention is a typo (a missing "l") in an added comment:

+ *     currtid_byrename

-- 
Jaime Casanova                      www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Default gucs for EXPLAIN
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: password_encryption default