Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior
| От | Jaime Casanova |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAJGNTeN4iqAAjUn1UJJR-Yhat-B7zsKkj50KN-AYzkE5fStXvw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 21:21, James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 2:49 PM Jaime Casanova
> <jaime.casanova@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > With sqlsmith I found a query that gives this error:
> > ERROR: ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found in targetlist
> >
[...]
> >
> > But if I set enable_incremental_sort to off the query gets executed
> > without problems (attached the explain produced for that case)
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
Hi,
by experiment I reduced the query to this
--- 0 ---
select distinct
subq_0.c1 as c0,
case when (true = pg_catalog.pg_rotate_logfile_old()) then
ref_0.t else ref_0.t
end
as c4
from
public.ref_0,
lateral (select
ref_0.i as c1
from
generate_series(1, 100) as ref_1) as subq_0
--- 0 ---
the only custom table already needed can be created with this commands:
--- 0 ---
create table ref_0 as select repeat('abcde', (random() * 10)::integer)
t, random() * 1000 i from generate_series(1, 500000);
create index on ref_0 (i);
analyze ref_0 ;
--- 0 ---
> Is there by an chance an index on ref_0.radi_text_temp?
>
there is an index involved but not on that field, commands above
create the index in the right column... after that, ANALYZE the table
> And if you set enable_hashagg = off what plan do you get (or error)?
>
same error
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: