Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Borodin
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal
Дата
Msg-id CAJEAwVFMYZcHQYDZHwR4QKdYvV9mmij=24L4gtc46AGZ0HV9rA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal
Список pgsql-hackers
2016-12-21 20:42 GMT+05:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> This whole subthread seems like a distraction to me.  I find it hard
> to believe that this test case would be stable enough to survive the
> buildfarm where, don't forget, we have things like
> CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS machines where queries take 100x longer to run.
> But even if it is, surely we can pick a less contrived test case.  So
> why worry about this?

David Fetter's test is deterministic and shall pass no matter how slow
and unpredictable perfromance is on a server.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of "unknown error" in dblink and postgres_fdw