Re: Grammar guidelines in Postgres

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Aleksander Alekseev
Тема Re: Grammar guidelines in Postgres
Дата
Msg-id CAJ7c6TNghk5btyKHi5L8YbbthbuHyNwfPwwJwQxjONXToVgd0w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Grammar guidelines in Postgres  (Harjyot Bagga <hsbagga28.dev@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> Thank you for your reply. I am aware about these conflicts, but thank you for the explanation.
> My question is specific to Postgres. Do we have a set of guidelines we keep in mind while writing grammar rules while
introducingnew features to postgres? 
>
> One such suggestion or rule for example is the Postgres does not support Postfix operators. So whenever a new feature
isintroduced developers make sure that they do not add a postfix operators in their grammar. Just like that are there
anyother further rules or suggestions compiled by post hackers and maintainers? 

I believe you wanted to reply to the mailing list, not to me directly.
Please use the "Reply to All" button.

Do the postfix operators you mention exist in the SQL standard?

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Aleksander Alekseev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Recommended books for admin
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_wal_summary_contents() and pg_walsummary may return different results on the same WAL summary file