Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed
От | Aleksander Alekseev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJ7c6TMx9PvSTbsgNjmRoYcJ+DU5TyCJz50ygDEBTVwqOSaR=g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, > > Isn't the cfbot.cputube.org web page obsolete now that we have the CI > > status directly in the commitfest page? > > Well, yeah, it's kind of duplicative --- but it slices the data > differently and it presents it differently. The more modern > pages don't have an easily-bookmarked summary of the state of > your own patches. (The "dashboard" page is cluttered with a ton > of other stuff, or at least it is for me.) So I still use the > cputube.org pages often, and I guess Aleksander does too. cfbot is more convenient in my typical use cases. Let's say I want to check if any of my patches needs a rebase. I just open: https://cfbot.cputube.org/aleksander-alekseev.html ... and instantly get the answer. I can achieve the same with CF app, however the URL is going to be different every month, e.g: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/55/?text=&status=-1&targetversion=-1&author=-3&reviewer=-1&sortkey= Occasionally CI may fail not because something is wrong with my patch. In such cases the "CI status" column shows me a red icon and something like "9/10". A few extra clicks are needed for every patch to understand what happened. When using cfbot I see right away that something went wrong on Windows for almost all the patches, as an example. I could leave without cfbot but this would make my workflow less convenient.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: