Re: rand48 replacement

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Aleksander Alekseev
Тема Re: rand48 replacement
Дата
Msg-id CAJ7c6TM2qJdtehyLA79gFtZ+h7jwRrksK4ZAW7boxgQJqQkRAw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: rand48 replacement  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Ответы Re: rand48 replacement  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Fabien,

> To summarize:
>   - better software engineering
>   - similar speed (slightly slower)
>   - better statistical quality
>   - quite small state
>   - soundness

Personally, I think your patch is great. Speaking of the speed I
believe we should consider the performance of the entire DBMS in
typical scenarios, not the performance of the single procedure. I'm
pretty sure in these terms the impact of your patch is neglectable
now, and almost certainly beneficial in the long term because of
better randomness.

While reviewing your patch I noticed that you missed
test_integerset.c. Here is an updated patch.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: rand48 replacement