On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Voras
<ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On the other hand, if the temp table can be completely ditched for a
> session variable or two, then yeah, that would be much better since
> you'd avoid the overhead of creating the table completely.
Yes, this is what I was aiming at, based on the OP mentioning he only
has a limited amount of data to manage in this way.
Yup, I'm going to see how this goes using session variables. I think it is exactly what I need. Thanks!
--
Moshe Jacobson
Nead Werx, Inc. | Senior Systems Engineer