Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
| От | Amit Khandekar |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAJ3gD9dwMi49pQ2vSAVjvW1zpBJmovDnmg9MZNiKR7X9s15h-A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10 March 2017 at 14:05, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> The need for >> num_workers=-1 will still be there for partial plans, because we need >> to set it to -1 once a worker finishes a plan. >> > > IIRC, we do that so that no other workers are assigned to it when > scanning the array of plans. But with the new scheme we don't need to > scan the non-parallel plans for when assigning plan to workers so -1 > may not be needed. I may be wrong though. > Still, when a worker finishes a partial subplan , it marks it as -1, so that no new workers pick this, even if there are other workers already executing it. -- Thanks, -Amit Khandekar EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: