Re: json function volatility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Merlin Moncure
Тема Re: json function volatility
Дата
Msg-id CAHyXU0yat7oc-sYmjAS5jpmyNVot+7w11sed_CNjZv_b6_vH0g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на json function volatility  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: json function volatility
Re: json function volatility
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Following up something Pavel wrote, I notice that json_agg() and
> json_object_agg() are both marked as immutable, even though they invoke IO
> functions, while json_object is marked stable, even though it does not, and
> can probably be marked as immutable. Mea maxima culpa.
>
> I'm not sure what we should do about these things now. Is it a tragedy if we
> let these escape into the 9.4 release that way?

Is it too late to change them?  Either way, it seems fairly
implausible someone would come up with a case to stick json_agg(), or
any aggregate function really, inside of an index. So it's not exactly
the crime of the century.

merlin



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Materialized views don't show up in information_schema
Следующее
От: Caleb Welton
Дата:
Сообщение: Issue with mkdtemp() in port.h