Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Merlin Moncure
Тема Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012
Дата
Msg-id CAHyXU0x8RjQY6pxEBMFq1nS_y9bxFjhO_kfYMf4u7zM9DV-q4g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Well, I assume they reimplemented libpq so that java would not rely on a
> platform-specific library like libpq.

yes, that is correct.  jdbc for postgres is a complete implementation
of the client side protocol.  this has some good and bad points -- on
the good side you have some features libpq is only about to get, like
row level result processing, but on them minus side you are missing
some features libpq has, like gssapi authentication (but you can still
get that with jdbc->odbc bridge).

but generally speaking jdbc is displacing odbc as the 'go to' library
for connection between different kinds of database systems, especially
on non-windows environments.  jdbc is to java as fdw is to postgres
basically.  so a fdw exposed jdbc driver should be able to connect and
gather data from just about anything -- even something like sql server
so that you could bypass the freetds dependency which is quite nice.

there's an odbc-fdw project that does something pretty similar and
might be a more natural choice for windows coders.

merlin


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why was the VAR 'optind' never changed in initdb?
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012