On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hate to use the term "bug" for what somebody's probably going to
> tell me is acceptable behavior, but that seems like a bug. I guess
> the root of the problem is that PL/plgsql's cache invalidation logic
> only considers the pg_proc row's TID and xmin when deciding whether to
> recompile. For base types that's probably OK, but for composite
> types, not so much.
It was a missed case in the invalidation logic. plpgsql was
deliberately modified to invalidate plans upon schema changes -- this
is a way to outsmart that system. definitely a bug IMNSHO.
merlin