Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Merlin Moncure
Тема Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Дата
Msg-id CAHyXU0wVbujf0RmNHFgH-CfYH2VjTQpUsew6VQD9nhMMqEv78A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the 9.5 cycle, and earlier, the topic of increasing our minimum
> bar for compilers came up a bunch of times. Specifically whether we
> still should continue to use C90 as a baseline.

Minor question: is there any value to keeping the client side code to
older standards?  On a previous project compiled libpq on many legacy
architectures because we were using it as frontend to backup software.
The project didn't end up taking off so it's no big deal to me, but
just throwing it out there: libpq has traditionally enjoyed broader
compiler support than the full project (borland, windows back in the
day).

merlin



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: what would tar file FDW look like?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Error message with plpgsql CONTINUE