Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Merlin Moncure
Тема Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Дата
Msg-id CAHyXU0wFFq0XKtMwRmuueWyjqFhyrAT4SfxoTv1idZ5nN1GwKA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday, January 29, 2019, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I propose that we implement and document this as
>> WITH ctename AS [ MATERIALIZE { ON | OFF } ] ( query )

> I hate to bikeshed here, but I think it's better english using that
> style of syntax to say,
>  WITH ctename AS [ MATERIALIZATION { ON | OFF } ] ( query )

Hm.  Doesn't really seem to fit with our style for options elsewhere;
for instance, EXPLAIN's options are things like ANALYZE ON/OFF and
VERBOSE ON/OFF, not ANALYSIS and VERBOSITY.

                        regards, tom lane

Yep...I'll concede the point.

merlin  

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: jsonpath
Следующее
От: "Ideriha, Takeshi"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries