Re: PG 9.1 much slower than 8.2 ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Keith
Тема Re: PG 9.1 much slower than 8.2 ?
Дата
Msg-id CAHw75vvi3hWN8JUXQZ_N-bd7m23z4R=iR5BwpPN9dYBV8VjCNA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PG 9.1 much slower than 8.2 ?  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: PG 9.1 much slower than 8.2 ?  (Marc Richter <mail@marc-richter.info>)
Список pgsql-novice



On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
Marc Richter schrieb am 26.08.2014 um 17:10:
> I've managed to create a dump of the database from 8.2.5 and
> inserting it into 9.1.13 successfully, thanks to the help of this
> list ("Upgrading from PG 8.2.5 to 9.1.13" - Thread). So I gave the
> result to another department to make their compatibility- and
> overall-tests on it. They did not come up with incompatibilities, but
> with a performance-related issue:
>
> When we do a "SELECT *" on a table with 355332 rows in it without
> using an index or limit or such, this takes round about 10.5 seconds
> on the PostgreSQL 8.2.5 host and 12.2 seconds on the PostgreSQL
> 9.1.13 host. Both servers are using the same database.

Can you share the output of explain analyze for both servers?

(for 9.1 maybe even "explain (analyze true, verbose true, buffers true) select ...")

Also: try to run a "vacuum full" on the 9.1 database - just to make sure

Thomas



--
Sent via pgsql-novice mailing list (pgsql-novice@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-novice

Actually, what may be more important than a vacuum full would be a full database analyze.
Just run "ANALYZE" while logged into your database via psql. With no tables given to the command, it should just analyze the whole thing. This should update the planner statistics which are probably empty after a full dump/restore.

В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Kellerer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 9.1 much slower than 8.2 ?
Следующее
От: Marc Richter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 9.1 much slower than 8.2 ?