Re: Improve documentation of publication privilege checks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Smith
Тема Re: Improve documentation of publication privilege checks
Дата
Msg-id CAHut+PvombcsmxHgAe-WzjBqNdAr9REePP=xXM_cvd_nS5C-dA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Improve documentation of publication privilege checks  (Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Improve documentation of publication privilege checks
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Shlok/Chao-San.

How about this alternative wording:

  <para>
   To create a publication using any of <literal>FOR ALL TABLES</literal>,
   <literal>FOR ALL SEQUENCES</literal>, or
   <literal>FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA</literal>, the user must be a superuser.
   To alter a publication using <literal>ADD TABLE</literal>, the user must
   have ownership rights on the table.  To alter a publication using
   <literal>ADD TABLES IN SCHEMA</literal>, the user must be a superuser.
  </para>


IMO this is both simpler and more consistent. PSA a diff for the same.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: