On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:45 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/27/23 23:06, Peter Smith wrote:
> > FWIW, here are some more minor review comments for v20231127-3-0001
> >
> > ======
> > .../replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c
> >
> > 3.
> > + * To decide if a sequence change is transactional, we maintain a hash
> > + * table of relfilenodes created in each (sub)transactions, along with
> > + * the XID of the (sub)transaction that created the relfilenode. The
> > + * entries from substransactions are copied to the top-level transaction
> > + * to make checks cheaper. The hash table gets cleaned up when the
> > + * transaction completes (commit/abort).
> >
> > /substransactions/subtransactions/
> >
>
> Will fix.
FYI - I think this typo still exists in the patch v20231128-0001.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia