Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
| От | Peter Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Skipping schema changes in publication |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAHut+Pv96u0VciuSx2B99jDHEvn7svVJynCmw-qYb=z4Kc2knA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Skipping schema changes in publication (Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Shlok. Some questions for the patch v25-0002 (EXCEPT tables) ====== doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_publication.sgml 1. +ALTER PUBLICATION <replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable> ADD ALL TABLES [ EXCEPT [ TABLE ] ( <replaceable class="parameter">exception_object</replaceable> [, ... ] ) ] You can do both ADD/SET the <publication_object>, so really there should be an ADD/SET ALL TABLES command as well, right? ~~~ 2. What was your reason for changing the syntax? AFAICT those added "( )" are not strictly necessary, so I just wondered your reason. For example, we do not have any "( )" for <publication_object> [,...]. It is: ALTER PUBLICATION name ADD publication_object [, ...] Not: ALTER PUBLICATION name ADD (publication_object [, ...]) So in the same way we could have EXCEPT syntax like that: ALTER PUBLICATION name ADD ALL TABLES [EXCEPT <table_exception_object> [, ...]] Where table_exception_object is: [ TABLE ] [ ONLY ] table_name [ * ] Currently, if the user just wants to exclude a single table they must do: ALTER PUBLICATION name ADD ALL TABLES EXCEPT (t1); instead of just ALTER PUBLICATION name ADD ALL TABLES EXCEPT t1; ~~~ 3. BTW, I think you may need to consider a <table_exception_object> instead of a generic name like <exception_object>, because in the future if we EXCEPT SEQUENCES the <exception_object> name may be not appropriate because things like [ONLY] and [*] are not applicable for sequences. ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: