Re: Add support for specifying tables in pg_createsubscriber.
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add support for specifying tables in pg_createsubscriber. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+Pv88obEAu7xegcXtQk8nLHgHkZ5Lg5sLXmWzFj8-SO5jA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add support for specifying tables in pg_createsubscriber. (Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add support for specifying tables in pg_createsubscriber.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Shubham, Here are some v14 review comments. ====== src/bin/pg_basebackup/pg_createsubscriber.c check_and_drop_publications: 1. + * Publications copied during physical replication remain on the subscriber + * after promotion. If --clean=publications is specified, drop all existing + * publications in the subscriber database. Otherwise, only drop publications + * that were created by pg_createsubscriber during this operation. + * + * In dry-run mode, create_publication() and drop_publication() only log actions + * without modifying the database. Importantly, since no publication is actually + * created in dry-run, the query for existing publications won't include the + * "would-be" made publication. Thus, we must call drop_publication() for it + * regardless of drop_all_pubs to ensure the user sees the intended log message. */ I think the "In dry-mode ..." paragraph is a good comment, but it doesn't need to be at the function level. IMO, this can all be cut/paste to later (see the next review comment). ~~~ 2. /* - * In dry-run mode, we don't create publications, but we still try to drop - * those to provide necessary information to the user. + * Handle the publication created (or would-be created) by + * pg_createsubscriber. In dry-run mode, enter this block regardless of + * drop_all_pubs to log the drop action for the made publication (which + * isn't actually present). */ The wording in the function header seemed better. IMO, this entire comment can be replaced like: /* * Handle publications created by pg_createsubscriber. * * <here cut/paste all the "In dry-mode..." wording from the function header comment> */ ~~~ I provided a top-up diff patch to illustrate my point. //////////////////// I also had a look at the 'results' logging from your script. ~~~ For test case 1. (new pub pub2 + clean): I hoped to see some evidence that --clean is dropping all other existing pubs; e.g. pub1,pub2,pub3, whatever... ~~~ For test case 3. (Existing pub pub1 + clean): I hoped to see some evidence that --clean is dropping existing pubs; e.g. pub1,pub2,pub3, whatever... ~~~ For test case 5. (Auto pub + clean): I hoped to see some evidence that --clean is dropping existing pubs; e.g. pub1,pub2,pub3, whatever... ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: