Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Smith
Тема Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Дата
Msg-id CAHut+PuZxXThYL23yxujehKzNT020-+F2rL1zXN8ZodEN=eirg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 1:31 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> 4) Should we change this to "The end LSN of the prepared transaction"
> just to avoid any confusion of it meaning commit/rollback.
> +<varlistentry>
> +<term>Int64</term>
> +<listitem><para>
> +                The end LSN of the transaction.
> +</para></listitem>
> +</varlistentry>
>

Can you please provide more details so I can be sure of the context of
this feedback, e.g. there are multiple places that match that patch
fragment provided. So was this suggestion to change all of them ( 'b',
'P', 'K' , 'r'  of patch 0001; and also 'p' of patch 0002) ?

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reducing opr_sanity test's runtime under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
Следующее
От: "tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: Remove "FROM" in "DELETE FROM" when using tab-completion